The government's decision to lower the cap on the number of its motorcycle taxi service bikers has angered those reliant on the app-based mode of transportation, and Angkas bikers, whose motorcycles have been the source of their livelihood.
The LTFRB, as a quasi-judicial body under the law, has the authority to perform quasi-judicial functions granted to it. This means it may acquire jurisdiction relating to any dispute concerning public grievances on transport policies, and has authority to revoke any franchise which it finds to be violative of its charter. It also plays important policy-making roles relevant to public safety mechanisms in the transportation sector. The scope of power is strong enough that an issuance of one memorandum alone may substantially affect the entire spectrum of transportation services, save those cases cognizable by the courts.
But why give the public such a hard time? If the issue has something to do with monopoly, control, or fair competition, which the law requires, then the LTFRB should first examine the effects through consultation and negotiation with parties involved. The capping should not be implemented outright while other Transportation Netwokr Companies (TNCs) are still in their initial operation, to give them ample time to augment and market their service to the riding public. (READ: #SaveAngkas trends worldwide: Netizens rage over plight of Angkas bikers)
The LTFRB cannot force bikers to transfer from Angkas to other motorcycle taxi providers when there is no assurance of the same benefits and perks they currently get from the former. This is a blatant violation of their freedom to act on certain matters personal to them. Let the other TNCs do the job. Let them find ways to attract the bikers to join them by offering better reasons to consider.
Leandro C. Tulod is a concerned commuter. He is in the process of transforming himself from a nobody to a somebody. He loves to go on hikes and is a certified beach bum.